I have just come into contact with e-cigarettes and have requirements for the taste of e-cigarettes, but don't care about the nicotine content
Female age 20
Have smoked real cigarettes and use electronic cigarettes as a substitute for real cigarettes, there is no requirement for nicotine content
Male age 33
Is a loyal customer of e-cigarettes, and has requirements for nicotine content in e-cigarettes, it is best to have multiple tastes at the same time
Male age 29
Living in an area where e-cigarettes are illegal and want to use e-cigarettes without breaking the law
Male age 21
I have used 0 nicotine e-cigarettes and am satisfied with the status quo, but look forward to more flavors
Who: Are there certain people or certain businesses that, although they share a lot in common with the others in your opportunity, nevertheless fall outside the boundary? Why?
Most companies that produce e-cigarettes have plenty of flavors to choose from, but not many of them offer 0 nicotine e-cigarettes. The interviewees chose not to choose from these electronic cigarettes. One of the reasons is that electronic cigarettes are illegal in some areas, and the other is hesitation about the safety of electronic cigarettes.
What: At what point does the need you identified differ from another need? (Is thirst the same as hunger? Or is the desire to appear fashionable the same as the desire to be loved by others?)
My opportunity meets consumer demand for e-cigarette taste while avoiding the risk of breaking the law.
Why: Is the underlying cause of the outsiders' need different than people who are inside the boundary?
Basically the same, but there are a few different requirements for taste and nicotine content.
|
Inside the boundary: e-cigarette company
|
What the Need
Is: health need, flavors and no risk against laws
|
Why the Need Exists: raise of attention
to physical health
|
|
Outside the boundary: traditional
cigarette company
|
What the Need Is Not: a new brand of e-cigarette
has no difference with other companies
|
Alternative Explanations: No exact
substitutes
|
No comments:
Post a Comment